head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs reviewdog
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. reviewdog has 9,716 stars, 512 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 235% (32,563 vs 9,716 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. reviewdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-review, static-analysis), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 512 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog A code review dog who keeps your codebase healthy. reviewdog provides a way to post review comments to code hosting services, such as GitHub, automatically by integrating with any linter tools with ease. It uses an output of lint tools and posts them as a comment if findings are in the diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in the local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. design doc Table of Contents Installation Input Format 'errorformat' Available pre defined 'errorformat' Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RDFormat) Diff checkstyle format SARIF format Code…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or reviewdog more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,716. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and reviewdog?
code-review-graph is written in Python and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or reviewdog?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.