head to head · open source

Gitea vs open-code-review

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars, 7,153 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-code-review has 34,427 stars, 2,452 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 69% (58,048 vs 34,427 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, open-code-review 7%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gitea ★ 58K open-code-review ★ 34K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gitea open-code-review
GitHub stars ★ 58K ★ 34K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.2K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gitea if

  • You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gitea profile →

pick open-code-review if

  • You want the open-code-review feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and open-code-review fits your workflow better

full open-code-review profile →

About Gitea

Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.

read the full Gitea overview →

About open-code-review

Open Code Review is an Apache 2.0, Go based AI code review CLI that reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM through a tool using agent, and returns line level review comments, built for developers and platform teams that want large scale review automated inside infrastructure they control.

read the full open-code-review overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler gogs vs open-code-review gogs vs code-review-graph opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gitea vs Gogs Gitea vs code-review-graph Gitea vs Reflex Gitea vs GitLab Gitea vs GitButler Gitea vs Coder Gitea vs gitpod Gitea vs pr-agent Gitea vs Encore Gitea vs reviewdog Gitea vs hunk Gitea vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is Gitea or open-code-review more popular?

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars and open-code-review has 34,427. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gitea and open-code-review free?

Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and open-code-review under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gitea and open-code-review?

Gitea is written in Go and open-code-review in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gitea or open-code-review?

Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,048 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-code-review if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.