head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs GitLab
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. GitLab has 24,549 stars, 5,943 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 33% (32,563 vs 24,549 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; GitLab is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, GitLab 24%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | GitLab | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 25K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 5.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GitLab if
- You want the GitLab feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and GitLab fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About GitLab
GitLab Canonical source The canonical source of GitLab where all development takes place is hosted on GitLab.com. If you wish to clone a copy of GitLab without proprietary code, you can use the read only mirror of GitLab located at However, please do not submit any issues and/or merge requests to that project. Free trial You can request a free trial of GitLab Ultimate on our website. Open source software to collaborate on code To see how GitLab looks please see the features page on our website. Manage Git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure Perform code reviews and enhance…
read the full GitLab overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or GitLab more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and GitLab has 24,549. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and GitLab free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT, and GitLab has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and GitLab?
code-review-graph is written in Python and GitLab in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or GitLab?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GitLab if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.