head to head · open source

Gitea vs GitLab

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars, 7,153 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GitLab has 24,544 stars, 5,983 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 137% (58,048 vs 24,544 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; GitLab is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, GitLab 24%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (gitlab), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gitea ★ 58K GitLab ★ 25K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gitea GitLab
GitHub stars ★ 58K ★ 25K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.2K ⑂ 6.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gitea if

  • You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gitea profile →

pick GitLab if

  • You want the GitLab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and GitLab fits your workflow better

full GitLab profile →

About Gitea

Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.

read the full Gitea overview →

About GitLab

GitLab is an open core DevSecOps platform that gives teams Git repository hosting, merge request code review, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and wikis in one self hostable application, aimed at organizations that want to run their development lifecycle on infrastructure they control.

read the full GitLab overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitbutler gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gitea vs Gogs Gitea vs open-code-review Gitea vs code-review-graph Gitea vs Reflex Gitea vs GitButler Gitea vs Coder Gitea vs gitpod Gitea vs pr-agent Gitea vs Encore Gitea vs reviewdog Gitea vs hunk Gitea vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is Gitea or GitLab more popular?

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars and GitLab has 24,544. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gitea and GitLab free?

Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT, and GitLab has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Gitea and GitLab?

Gitea is written in Go and GitLab in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gitea or GitLab?

Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,048 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GitLab if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.