head to head · open source

Gogs vs open-code-review

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. open-code-review has 34,427 stars, 2,452 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 39% (47,821 vs 34,427 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, open-code-review 7%. open-code-review was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K open-code-review ★ 34K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs open-code-review
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 34K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick open-code-review if

  • You want the open-code-review feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and open-code-review fits your workflow better

full open-code-review profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About open-code-review

Open Code Review is an Apache 2.0, Go based AI code review CLI that reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM through a tool using agent, and returns line level review comments, built for developers and platform teams that want large scale review automated inside infrastructure they control.

read the full open-code-review overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs open-code-review gogs vs code-review-graph gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs code-review-graph Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs reviewdog Gogs vs hunk Gogs vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or open-code-review more popular?

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars and open-code-review has 34,427. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and open-code-review free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and open-code-review under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and open-code-review?

Gogs is written in Go and open-code-review in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or open-code-review?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-code-review if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.