head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs GitButler
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. GitButler has 21,914 stars, 1,044 forks, 439 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 49% (32,563 vs 21,914 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; GitButler is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, GitButler 5%. GitButler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | GitButler | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 22K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 1.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GitButler if
- You want the GitButler feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and GitButler fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About GitButler
GitButler Git, but better . GitButler is a modern Git based version control interface with both a GUI and CLI built from the ground up for AI powered workflows. Website • Blog • Docs • Downloads Our beautiful GUI Our amazing but CLI [![TWEET][s1]][l1] [ ![BLUESKY][s8]][l8] [![DISCORD][s2]][l2] [![CI][s0]][l0] [![INSTA][s3]][l3] [![YOUTUBE][s5]][l5] [![DEEPWIKI][s7]][l7] [s0]: [l0]: [s1]: [l1]: [s2]: [l2]: [s3]: [l3]: [s5]: [l5]: [s7]: [l7]: [s8]: [l8]: GitButler is a powerful new Git based version control system, designed from scratch to be simple, powerful and flexible. It is designed for ease of use and modern…
read the full GitButler overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or GitButler more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and GitButler has 21,914. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and GitButler free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT, and GitButler has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and GitButler?
code-review-graph is written in Python and GitButler in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or GitButler?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GitButler if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.