head to head · open source
Gitea vs code-review-graph
Gitea has 58,826 GitHub stars, 7,348 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph has 32,563 stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Gitea leads on adoption by 81% (58,826 vs 32,563 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gitea | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 59K | ★ 33K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.3K | ⑂ 3.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gitea if
- You weight community size — 59K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-review-graph if
- You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better
About Gitea
Gitea 繁體中文 简体中文 Purpose The goal of Gitea is to make the easiest, fastest, and most painless way of setting up a self hosted all in one software development service, including Git hosting, code management, code review, issue tracking, project kanban, wiki, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD which can reuse GitHub Actions. As Gitea is written in Go, it works across all the platforms and architectures that are supported by Go, including Linux, macOS, FreeBSD/OpenBSD and Windows on x86, amd64, ARM, RISC V 64 and PowerPC architectures. For online demonstrations, you can visit demo.gitea.com. For…
read the full Gitea overview →
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea or code-review-graph more popular?
Gitea has 58,826 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 32,563. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gitea and code-review-graph free?
Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gitea and code-review-graph?
Gitea is written in Go and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gitea or code-review-graph?
Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,826 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.