head to head · open source
Gitea vs code-review-graph
Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars, 7,153 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph has 31,548 stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 84% (58,048 vs 31,548 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gitea | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 32K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.2K | ⑂ 2.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gitea if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-review-graph if
- You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better
About Gitea
Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.
read the full Gitea overview →
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea or code-review-graph more popular?
Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 31,548. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gitea and code-review-graph free?
Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gitea and code-review-graph?
Gitea is written in Go and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gitea or code-review-graph?
Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,048 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.