head to head · open source

ECC vs Supabase

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars, 39,186 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Supabase has 110,097 stars, 14,262 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 138% (261,896 vs 110,097 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Supabase 13%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K Supabase ★ 110K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Supabase
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 110K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 14K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Supabase if

  • You want the Supabase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Supabase fits your workflow better

full Supabase profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K

Related comparisons

react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce ECC vs TipTap ECC vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Supabase more popular?

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars and Supabase has 110,097. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Supabase free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and Supabase under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and Supabase?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Supabase in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Supabase?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (261,896 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Supabase if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.