head to head · open source

Gogs vs code-review-graph

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. code-review-graph has 31,548 stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 52% (47,821 vs 31,548 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K code-review-graph ★ 32K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs code-review-graph
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 32K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick code-review-graph if

  • You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better

full code-review-graph profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About code-review-graph

code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.

read the full code-review-graph overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs open-code-review Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs reviewdog Gogs vs hunk Gogs vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or code-review-graph more popular?

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 31,548. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and code-review-graph free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and code-review-graph?

Gogs is written in Go and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or code-review-graph?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.