head to head · open source
Gogs vs code-review-graph
Gogs has 47,914 GitHub stars, 5,076 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. code-review-graph has 32,563 stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Gogs leads on adoption by 47% (47,914 vs 32,563 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. Gogs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gogs | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 33K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 3.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gogs if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-review-graph if
- You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better
About Gogs
👉 Deploy on DigitalOcean and get $200 in free credits ! 🔮 Vision The Gogs ( /gɑgz/ ) project aims to build a simple, stable and extensible self hosted Git service that can be set up in the most painless way. With Go, this can be done with an independent binary distribution across all platforms that Go supports, including Linux, macOS, Windows and ARM based systems. 📡 Overview Please visit our home page for user documentation. Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for list of changes in each releases. Want to try it before doing anything else? Do it online! Having trouble? Help yourself with troubleshooting or ask…
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or code-review-graph more popular?
Gogs has 47,914 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 32,563. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gogs and code-review-graph free?
Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gogs and code-review-graph?
Gogs is written in Go and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gogs or code-review-graph?
Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,914 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.