head to head · open source
codegraph vs code-review-graph
codegraph has 76,560 GitHub stars, 5,089 forks, 244 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. code-review-graph has 32,591 stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. codegraph leads on adoption by 135% (76,560 vs 32,591 stars). codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. codegraph has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. codegraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codegraph | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 77K | ★ 33K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 3.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codegraph if
- You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-review-graph if
- You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better
About codegraph
CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…
read the full codegraph overview →
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codegraph or code-review-graph more popular?
codegraph has 76,560 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 32,591. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.
Are codegraph and code-review-graph free?
Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codegraph and code-review-graph?
codegraph is written in TypeScript and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codegraph or code-review-graph?
Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (76,560 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.