head to head · open source

codegraph vs code-review-graph

codegraph has 71,514 GitHub stars, 4,598 forks, 526 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. code-review-graph has 31,619 stars, 2,878 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. codegraph leads on adoption by 126% (71,514 vs 31,619 stars). codegraph is written in C under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. codegraph has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codegraph ★ 72K code-review-graph ★ 32K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codegraph code-review-graph
GitHub stars ★ 72K ★ 32K
License MIT MIT
Written in C Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codegraph if

  • You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codegraph profile →

pick code-review-graph if

  • You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better

full code-review-graph profile →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

About code-review-graph

code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.

read the full code-review-graph overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

gitea vs code-review-graph openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip gitea vs gogs gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer react vs vscode

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

codegraph vs OpenCode codegraph vs pi codegraph vs OpenHands codegraph vs Paperclip codegraph vs rtk codegraph vs Orca codegraph vs Cline codegraph vs Aider codegraph vs Continue codegraph vs Tabby codegraph vs Grok Build codegraph vs T3 Code

Frequently asked questions

Is codegraph or code-review-graph more popular?

codegraph has 71,514 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 31,619. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are codegraph and code-review-graph free?

Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codegraph and code-review-graph?

codegraph is written in C and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codegraph or code-review-graph?

Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (71,514 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.