head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs hunk
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. hunk has 9,741 stars, 325 forks, 162 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 234% (32,563 vs 9,741 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; hunk is written in TypeScript under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, hunk 3%. hunk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | hunk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 325 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick hunk if
- You want the hunk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and hunk fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About hunk
hunk Hunk is a review first terminal diff viewer for agent authored changesets, built on OpenTUI and Pierre diffs. hunk.dev · Documentation multi file review stream with sidebar navigation inline AI and agent annotations beside the code split, unified, and responsive auto layouts watch mode for auto reloading file and Git backed reviews keyboard, mouse, pager, and Git difftool support Split view with sidebar and inline AI notes Unified view and mouse selectable menus Install The default installation method on macOS and Linux downloads a standalone binary and installs it into /.hunk . It checks the archive…
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or hunk more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and hunk has 9,741. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and hunk free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and hunk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and hunk?
code-review-graph is written in Python and hunk in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or hunk?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose hunk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.