head to head · open source

code-review-graph vs Coder

code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Coder has 17,256 stars, 1,642 forks, 996 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 89% (32,563 vs 17,256 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; Coder is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Coder 10%. Coder was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

code-review-graph ★ 33K Coder ★ 17K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

code-review-graph Coder
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 17K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-10-29 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick code-review-graph if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full code-review-graph profile →

pick Coder if

  • You want the Coder feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Coder fits your workflow better

full Coder profile →

About code-review-graph

code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…

read the full code-review-graph overview →

About Coder

Self Hosted Cloud Development Environments and AI Agents Quickstart Docs Why Coder Premium Coder is a self hosted platform for cloud development environments and AI coding agents. Workspaces are defined with Terraform, connected through a secure Wireguard® tunnel, and automatically shut down when not used. Coder Agents runs a native AI coding agent whose loop executes in the control plane on your infrastructure, with no API keys in workspaces. Define cloud development environments in Terraform EC2 VMs, Kubernetes Pods, Docker Containers, etc. Automatically shutdown idle resources to save on costs Onboard…

read the full Coder overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Frequently asked questions

Is code-review-graph or Coder more popular?

code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and Coder has 17,256. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.

Are code-review-graph and Coder free?

Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and Coder under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between code-review-graph and Coder?

code-review-graph is written in Python and Coder in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, code-review-graph or Coder?

Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Coder if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.