head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs gitpod
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. gitpod has 13,804 stars, 1,394 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 136% (32,563 vs 13,804 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; gitpod is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, gitpod 10%. gitpod was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | gitpod | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 14K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gitpod if
- You want the gitpod feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and gitpod fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About gitpod
Gitpod has been renamed to Ona mission control for software projects and software engineering agents . We no longer recommend this version of Gitpod, users should take advantage of Ona's free tier or contact sales for enterprise. With Ona you gain more powerful development environments than Gitpod Classic with industry standard specifications based on Dev Container and Ona Agents. Gitpod Classic Gitpod Classic is a developer platform providing on demand, pre configured development environments in the cloud. It allows developers to spin up secure workspaces with a simple .gitpod.yml configuration file…
read the full gitpod overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or gitpod more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and gitpod has 13,804. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and gitpod free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and gitpod under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and gitpod?
code-review-graph is written in Python and gitpod in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or gitpod?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gitpod if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.