head to head · open source

three.js vs OpenRA

three.js has 115,727 GitHub stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped today. OpenRA has 17,408 stars, 3,048 forks, 1,598 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. three.js leads on adoption by 565% (115,727 vs 17,408 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; OpenRA is written in C# under GPL-3.0. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, OpenRA 18%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K OpenRA ★ 17K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js OpenRA
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 17K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C#
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 3.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick OpenRA if

  • You want the OpenRA feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and OpenRA fits your workflow better

full OpenRA profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About OpenRA

OpenRA is a libre, free and open source real time strategy game engine written in C with SDL and OpenGL, built for players, mappers and modders who want to run and extend early Westwood classics such as Command & Conquer: Red Alert, Command & Conquer: Tiberian Dawn and Dune 2000 on Windows, Linux, BSD and Mac OS X.

read the full OpenRA overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

godot vs three-js three-js vs imgui three-js vs home-assistant three-js vs hey three-js vs octobot three-js vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs Babylon.js three.js vs libgdx three.js vs aframe three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or OpenRA more popular?

three.js has 115,727 GitHub stars and OpenRA has 17,408. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and OpenRA free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and OpenRA under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and OpenRA?

three.js is written in JavaScript and OpenRA in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or OpenRA?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,727 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenRA if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.