head to head · open source

three.js vs entt

three.js has 115,865 GitHub stars, 36,571 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped today. entt has 13,139 stars, 1,117 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js leads on adoption by 782% (115,865 vs 13,139 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; entt is written in C++ under MIT. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, entt 9%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K entt ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js entt
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick entt if

  • You want the entt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and entt fits your workflow better

full entt profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About entt

EnTT is a header only, MIT licensed library written in modern C++ that provides a fast entity component system (ECS) for game programming and more, aimed at game, engine and data oriented developers who want the ECS architectural pattern without adopting a full framework.

read the full entt overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

godot vs three-js three-js vs imgui three-js vs home-assistant three-js vs hey three-js vs octobot three-js vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs Babylon.js three.js vs libgdx three.js vs aframe three.js vs OpenRA three.js vs engine three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs ebiten

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or entt more popular?

three.js has 115,865 GitHub stars and entt has 13,139. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and entt free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and entt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and entt?

three.js is written in JavaScript and entt in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or entt?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,865 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose entt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.