head to head · open source

sharp vs libvips

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars, 1,437 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. libvips has 11,656 stars, 797 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 180% (32,695 vs 11,656 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; libvips is written in C under LGPL-2.1. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, libvips 7%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (image-processing, jpeg, libvips), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K libvips ★ 12K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp libvips
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 LGPL-2.1
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick libvips if

  • You want the libvips feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and libvips fits your workflow better

full libvips profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About libvips

libvips is a demand driven, horizontally threaded image processing library in C, licensed LGPL 2.1 or later, for developers who need to resize, convert and analyse large images quickly without exhausting memory.

read the full libvips overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or libvips more popular?

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars and libvips has 11,656. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and libvips free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and libvips under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and libvips?

sharp is written in JavaScript and libvips in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or libvips?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose libvips if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.