head to head · open source

sharp vs Shotcut

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Shotcut has 15,234 stars, 1,509 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 115% (32,692 vs 15,234 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Shotcut is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Shotcut 10%. Shotcut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K Shotcut ★ 15K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp Shotcut
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick Shotcut if

  • You want the Shotcut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Shotcut fits your workflow better

full Shotcut profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About Shotcut

Shotcut is a free, open source, cross platform video editor written in C++ and released under the GPL 3.0 license. It lives in the Qt and MLT ecosystem, using Qt for its application and user interface and MLT as its multimedia authoring framework. It provides regularly built binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows, and is positioned as an open alternative to Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve (Studio).

read the full Shotcut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs shotcut opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview sharp vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or Shotcut more popular?

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars and Shotcut has 15,234. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and Shotcut free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Shotcut under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and Shotcut?

sharp is written in JavaScript and Shotcut in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or Shotcut?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Shotcut if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.