head to head · open source

sharp vs Krita

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Krita has 10,388 stars, 856 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 215% (32,692 vs 10,388 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Krita is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Krita 8%. Krita was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K Krita ★ 10K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp Krita
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 856
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick Krita if

  • You want the Krita feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Krita fits your workflow better

full Krita profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About Krita

Krita is a free and open source cross platform application for digital painting. It lives in the KDE ecosystem and is built on the KDE and Qt frameworks. The project is licensed under the GNU Public License, Version 3, and the GitHub repository is a mirror of the real code repository at https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita.git.

read the full Krita overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs krita opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview sharp vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or Krita more popular?

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars and Krita has 10,388. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and Krita free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Krita under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and Krita?

sharp is written in JavaScript and Krita in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or Krita?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Krita if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.