head to head · open source

sharp vs Darktable

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Darktable has 13,094 stars, 1,435 forks, 678 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 150% (32,692 vs 13,094 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Darktable is written in C under GPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Darktable 11%. Darktable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K Darktable ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp Darktable
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick Darktable if

  • You want the Darktable feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Darktable fits your workflow better

full Darktable profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About Darktable

Darktable is an open source photography workflow application and non destructive raw developer. It acts as a virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers, and it lives in the open source photography ecosystem as a C project licensed under the GPL 3.0. It manages digital negatives in a database, lets a user view them through a zoomable lighttable, and supports raw development, enhancement, and export to local or remote storage.

read the full Darktable overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs darktable opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview sharp vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or Darktable more popular?

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars and Darktable has 13,094. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and Darktable free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Darktable under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and Darktable?

sharp is written in JavaScript and Darktable in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or Darktable?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Darktable if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.