head to head · open source

filepond vs chevereto

filepond has 16,394 GitHub stars, 849 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chevereto has 995 stars, 84 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. filepond leads on adoption by 1,548% (16,394 vs 995 stars). filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT; chevereto is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. filepond has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, chevereto 8%. filepond was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filepond ★ 16K chevereto ★ 995 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

filepond chevereto
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 995
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 849 ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filepond if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filepond profile →

pick chevereto if

  • You want the chevereto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and chevereto fits your workflow better

full chevereto profile →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

About chevereto

Chevereto is a self hosted, AGPL 3.0 media sharing platform written in PHP that lets an individual or an organisation run its own image and video hosting site — a Flickr or Imgur of their own — with complete control over content, data and platform rules.

read the full chevereto overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs filepond opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

filepond vs OpenCut filepond vs LosslessCut filepond vs sharp filepond vs rembg filepond vs Audacity filepond vs Shotcut filepond vs ImageToolbox filepond vs palmier-pro filepond vs Darktable filepond vs libvips filepond vs imgproxy filepond vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is filepond or chevereto more popular?

filepond has 16,394 GitHub stars and chevereto has 995. filepond has the larger community by that measure.

Are filepond and chevereto free?

Both are open source. filepond is licensed under MIT and chevereto under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filepond and chevereto?

filepond is written in JavaScript and chevereto in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filepond or chevereto?

Choose filepond if you want the larger community (16,394 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chevereto if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.