head to head · open source

sharp vs Darktable

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars, 1,437 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Darktable has 13,106 stars, 1,434 forks, 678 open issues and last shipped today. sharp leads on adoption by 149% (32,695 vs 13,106 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Darktable is written in C under GPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Darktable 11%. Darktable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K Darktable ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp Darktable
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick Darktable if

  • You want the Darktable feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Darktable fits your workflow better

full Darktable profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About Darktable

Darktable is an open source photography workflow application and non destructive raw developer. It acts as a virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers, and it lives in the open source photography ecosystem as a C project licensed under the GPL 3.0. It manages digital negatives in a database, lets a user view them through a zoomable lighttable, and supports raw development, enhancement, and export to local or remote storage.

read the full Darktable overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or Darktable more popular?

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars and Darktable has 13,106. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and Darktable free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Darktable under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and Darktable?

sharp is written in JavaScript and Darktable in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or Darktable?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Darktable if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.