head to head · open source

sharp vs libvips

sharp has 32,693 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. libvips has 11,655 stars, 797 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 181% (32,693 vs 11,655 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; libvips is written in C under LGPL-2.1. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, libvips 7%. libvips was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (image-processing, jpeg, libvips), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K libvips ★ 12K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp libvips
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 LGPL-2.1
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick libvips if

  • You want the libvips feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and libvips fits your workflow better

full libvips profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About libvips

libvips is a demand driven, horizontally threaded image processing library in C, licensed LGPL 2.1 or later, for developers who need to resize, convert and analyse large images quickly without exhausting memory.

read the full libvips overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or libvips more popular?

sharp has 32,693 GitHub stars and libvips has 11,655. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and libvips free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and libvips under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and libvips?

sharp is written in JavaScript and libvips in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or libvips?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,693 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose libvips if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.