head to head · open source

Audacity vs PixImagePicker

Audacity has 18,571 GitHub stars, 2,674 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. PixImagePicker has 871 stars, 219 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 2,032% (18,571 vs 871 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; PixImagePicker is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, PixImagePicker 25%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 19K PixImagePicker ★ 871 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity PixImagePicker
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 871
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-04-15
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 219
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick PixImagePicker if

  • You want the PixImagePicker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and PixImagePicker fits your workflow better

full PixImagePicker profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About PixImagePicker

PixImagePicker (Pix) is an Apache 2.0 Kotlin library for Android that reproduces the WhatsApp image and video picker inside an existing app, aimed at Android developers who need a gallery, camera and video selection flow without building one from scratch.

read the full PixImagePicker overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs libvips Audacity vs imgproxy Audacity vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or PixImagePicker more popular?

Audacity has 18,571 GitHub stars and PixImagePicker has 871. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and PixImagePicker free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and PixImagePicker is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and PixImagePicker?

Audacity is written in C++ and PixImagePicker in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or PixImagePicker?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,571 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose PixImagePicker if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.