head to head · open source
Audacity vs filepond
Audacity has 18,928 GitHub stars, 2,712 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filepond has 16,392 stars, 851 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 15% (18,928 vs 16,392 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, filepond 5%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Audacity | filepond | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 19K | ★ 16K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 851 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Audacity if
- You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick filepond if
- You want the filepond feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and filepond fits your workflow better
About Audacity
Audacity Audacity is an easy to use, multi track audio editor and recorder for Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux and other operating systems. More info can be found on This repository is currently undergoing major structural change. We're currently working on Audacity 4, which means an entirely new UI and also refactorings aplenty. As such, the master branch is currently not particularly friendly to new contributors. It is still possible to submit patches to Audacity 3.x; make sure you branch off audacity3 if you choose to do so. Build instructions for 3.x can be found here; build instructions for Audacity 4 can be…
read the full Audacity overview →
About filepond
A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads, and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience. FilePond adapters are available for React , Vue , Angular , Svelte , and jQuery FilePond v5 Alpha version now available for testing Documentation • Discord • Examples Buy me a Coffee • Use FilePond with Pintura • Dev updates Core Features Accepts directories , files , blobs, local URLs, remote URLs and Data URIs. Drop files , select on filesystem, copy and paste files , or add files using the API. Async uploads with AJAX, supports chunk uploads , can…
read the full filepond overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Audacity or filepond more popular?
Audacity has 18,928 GitHub stars and filepond has 16,392. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.
Are Audacity and filepond free?
Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and filepond is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Audacity and filepond?
Audacity is written in C++ and filepond in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Audacity or filepond?
Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,928 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose filepond if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.