head to head · open source
Audacity vs filepond
Audacity has 18,477 GitHub stars, 2,668 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filepond has 16,393 stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 13% (18,477 vs 16,393 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, filepond 5%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Audacity | filepond | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 18K | ★ 16K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 848 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Audacity if
- You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick filepond if
- You want the filepond feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and filepond fits your workflow better
About Audacity
Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.
read the full Audacity overview →
About filepond
FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.
read the full filepond overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Audacity or filepond more popular?
Audacity has 18,477 GitHub stars and filepond has 16,393. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.
Are Audacity and filepond free?
Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and filepond is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Audacity and filepond?
Audacity is written in C++ and filepond in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Audacity or filepond?
Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,477 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose filepond if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.