head to head · open source

Audacity vs libvips

Audacity has 18,479 GitHub stars, 2,667 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. libvips has 11,655 stars, 797 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 59% (18,479 vs 11,655 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; libvips is written in C under LGPL-2.1. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, libvips 7%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 18K libvips ★ 12K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity libvips
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 12K
License Custom / other LGPL-2.1
Written in C++ C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick libvips if

  • You want the libvips feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and libvips fits your workflow better

full libvips profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About libvips

libvips is a demand driven, horizontally threaded image processing library in C, licensed LGPL 2.1 or later, for developers who need to resize, convert and analyse large images quickly without exhausting memory.

read the full libvips overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs Krita Audacity vs TagStudio Audacity vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or libvips more popular?

Audacity has 18,479 GitHub stars and libvips has 11,655. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and libvips free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and libvips is licensed under LGPL-2.1. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and libvips?

Audacity is written in C++ and libvips in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or libvips?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,479 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose libvips if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.