head to head · open source

Audacity vs home-gallery

Audacity has 18,523 GitHub stars, 2,666 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. home-gallery has 1,183 stars, 106 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 1,466% (18,523 vs 1,183 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; home-gallery is written in JavaScript under MIT. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, home-gallery 9%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 19K home-gallery ★ 1.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity home-gallery
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.2K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-06-25
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 106
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick home-gallery if

  • You want the home-gallery feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and home-gallery fits your workflow better

full home-gallery profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About home-gallery

HomeGallery is a self hosted, MIT licensed open source web gallery for people who keep their photo and video archives on their own hardware and want a private, mobile friendly way to browse them, including tagging and AI powered image and face discovery.

read the full home-gallery overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs libvips Audacity vs imgproxy Audacity vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or home-gallery more popular?

Audacity has 18,523 GitHub stars and home-gallery has 1,183. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and home-gallery free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and home-gallery is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and home-gallery?

Audacity is written in C++ and home-gallery in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or home-gallery?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,523 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose home-gallery if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.