head to head · open source
webrtc vs Timeplus
webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars, 1,887 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Timeplus has 2,260 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. webrtc leads on adoption by 643% (16,785 vs 2,260 stars). webrtc is written in Go under MIT; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. webrtc has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. webrtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webrtc | Timeplus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webrtc if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Timeplus if
- You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better
About webrtc
Pion WebRTC is a pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API, aimed at Go developers who need real time audio, video, and data channels running inside their own applications rather than inside a browser tab or a C++ codebase.
read the full webrtc overview →
About Timeplus
Timeplus Proton is an open source stream processing engine written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is presented as a single binary SQL pipeline engine for real time analytics, observability, ETL, and AI context. It lives in the messaging and event streaming ecosystem, with topic links to Kafka, ClickHouse, Flink, ksqlDB, Iceberg, and observability.
read the full Timeplus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webrtc or Timeplus more popular?
webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,260. webrtc has the larger community by that measure.
Are webrtc and Timeplus free?
Both are open source. webrtc is licensed under MIT and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webrtc and Timeplus?
webrtc is written in Go and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webrtc or Timeplus?
Choose webrtc if you want the larger community (16,785 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.