head to head · open source
webrtc vs Timeplus
webrtc has 16,874 GitHub stars, 1,916 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Timeplus has 2,280 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. webrtc leads on adoption by 640% (16,874 vs 2,280 stars). webrtc is written in Go under MIT; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. webrtc has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. webrtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webrtc | Timeplus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webrtc if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Timeplus if
- You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better
About webrtc
Pion WebRTC A pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API New Release Pion WebRTC v4.0.0 has been released! See the release notes to learn about new features and breaking changes. If you aren't able to upgrade yet check the tags for the latest v3 release. We would love your feedback! Please create GitHub issues or Join the Discord to follow development and speak with the maintainers. Usage Go Modules are mandatory for using Pion WebRTC. So make sure you set export GO111MODULE=on , and explicitly specify /v4 (or an earlier version) when importing. example applications contains code samples of common things people…
read the full webrtc overview →
About Timeplus
Fastest SQL pipeline engine for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI What's Timeplus Proton 🚀 The fastest SQL pipeline engine in a single C++ binary, for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI. A simple, fast and efficient alternative to ksqlDB and Apache Flink, powered by ClickHouse engine. 🔥 SQL for everything : Native source/sink (Kafka, ClickHouse, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, S3/Iceberg, OpenSearch etc.), Streaming ingestion, Multi stream JOINs, Incremental Materialized Views, Alerting, Tasks, UDF in Python/JS etc. ⚡ No JVM. No ZooKeeper. Zero dependencies. Just speed, control and…
read the full Timeplus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webrtc or Timeplus more popular?
webrtc has 16,874 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,280. webrtc has the larger community by that measure.
Are webrtc and Timeplus free?
Both are open source. webrtc is licensed under MIT and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webrtc and Timeplus?
webrtc is written in Go and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webrtc or Timeplus?
Choose webrtc if you want the larger community (16,874 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.