head to head · open source

webrtc vs Soketi

webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars, 1,887 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Soketi has 5,633 stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. webrtc leads on adoption by 198% (16,785 vs 5,633 stars). webrtc is written in Go under MIT; Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. webrtc has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Soketi 6%. webrtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (p2p), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webrtc ★ 17K Soketi ★ 5.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

webrtc Soketi
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 5.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2025-03-03
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 363
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webrtc if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webrtc profile →

pick Soketi if

  • You want the Soketi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Soketi fits your workflow better

full Soketi profile →

About webrtc

Pion WebRTC is a pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API, aimed at Go developers who need real time audio, video, and data channels running inside their own applications rather than inside a browser tab or a C++ codebase.

read the full webrtc overview →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi soketi vs timeplus automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

webrtc vs kafka webrtc vs nats-server webrtc vs AutoMQ webrtc vs MadelineProto webrtc vs dino webrtc vs Timeplus webrtc vs Sequin webrtc vs Trench webrtc vs Hook0 webrtc vs Operational webrtc vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is webrtc or Soketi more popular?

webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars and Soketi has 5,633. webrtc has the larger community by that measure.

Are webrtc and Soketi free?

Both are open source. webrtc is licensed under MIT and Soketi under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webrtc and Soketi?

webrtc is written in Go and Soketi in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webrtc or Soketi?

Choose webrtc if you want the larger community (16,785 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Soketi if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.