head to head · open source

webrtc vs routr

webrtc has 16,786 GitHub stars, 1,889 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped yesterday. routr has 1,709 stars, 180 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. webrtc leads on adoption by 882% (16,786 vs 1,709 stars). webrtc is written in Go under MIT; routr is written in TypeScript under MIT. webrtc has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, routr 11%. webrtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webrtc ★ 17K routr ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

webrtc routr
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 180
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webrtc if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webrtc profile →

pick routr if

  • You want the routr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and routr fits your workflow better

full routr profile →

About webrtc

Pion WebRTC is a pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API, aimed at Go developers who need real time audio, video, and data channels running inside their own applications rather than inside a browser tab or a C++ codebase.

read the full webrtc overview →

About routr

Routr is an MIT licensed, TypeScript based SIP proxy, location server and registrar that gives telephony carriers, communication service providers and integrators a reliable, scalable and programmable SIP infrastructure deployable with Docker, Compose or a Kubernetes Helm chart.

read the full routr overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

webrtc vs kafka webrtc vs nats-server webrtc vs AutoMQ webrtc vs Soketi webrtc vs MadelineProto webrtc vs dino webrtc vs Timeplus webrtc vs Sequin webrtc vs SIP.js webrtc vs Trench webrtc vs Hook0 webrtc vs Operational

Frequently asked questions

Is webrtc or routr more popular?

webrtc has 16,786 GitHub stars and routr has 1,709. webrtc has the larger community by that measure.

Are webrtc and routr free?

Both are open source. webrtc is licensed under MIT and routr under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webrtc and routr?

webrtc is written in Go and routr in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webrtc or routr?

Choose webrtc if you want the larger community (16,786 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose routr if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.