head to head · open source

webrtc vs SIP.js

webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars, 1,887 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SIP.js has 2,096 stars, 728 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. webrtc leads on adoption by 701% (16,785 vs 2,096 stars). webrtc is written in Go under MIT; SIP.js is written in TypeScript under MIT. webrtc has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, SIP.js 35%. webrtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webrtc ★ 17K SIP.js ★ 2.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

webrtc SIP.js
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 2.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-15
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 728
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webrtc if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webrtc profile →

pick SIP.js if

  • You want the SIP.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and SIP.js fits your workflow better

full SIP.js profile →

About webrtc

Pion WebRTC is a pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API, aimed at Go developers who need real time audio, video, and data channels running inside their own applications rather than inside a browser tab or a C++ codebase.

read the full webrtc overview →

About SIP.js

SIP.js is an MIT licensed TypeScript library that gives web applications a JavaScript signaling stack for SIP over WebSocket, so browsers can place and receive real time audio and video sessions through WebRTC.

read the full SIP.js overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

webrtc vs kafka webrtc vs nats-server webrtc vs AutoMQ webrtc vs Soketi webrtc vs MadelineProto webrtc vs dino webrtc vs Timeplus webrtc vs Sequin webrtc vs Trench webrtc vs Hook0 webrtc vs Operational webrtc vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is webrtc or SIP.js more popular?

webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars and SIP.js has 2,096. webrtc has the larger community by that measure.

Are webrtc and SIP.js free?

Both are open source. webrtc is licensed under MIT and SIP.js under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webrtc and SIP.js?

webrtc is written in Go and SIP.js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webrtc or SIP.js?

Choose webrtc if you want the larger community (16,785 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SIP.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.