head to head · open source
webrtc vs Sequin
webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars, 1,887 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sequin has 2,203 stars, 149 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. webrtc leads on adoption by 662% (16,785 vs 2,203 stars). webrtc is written in Go under MIT; Sequin is written in Elixir under MIT. webrtc has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Sequin 7%. webrtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (streaming), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webrtc | Sequin | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-02-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 149 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webrtc if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Sequin if
- You want the Sequin feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and Sequin fits your workflow better
About webrtc
Pion WebRTC is a pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API, aimed at Go developers who need real time audio, video, and data channels running inside their own applications rather than inside a browser tab or a C++ codebase.
read the full webrtc overview →
About Sequin
Sequin is an open source change data capture platform for Postgres. It lives in the Postgres ecosystem and reads database changes, then sends those changes to streams, queues, search indexes, and other endpoints. The project is written in Elixir and released under the MIT license.
read the full Sequin overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webrtc or Sequin more popular?
webrtc has 16,785 GitHub stars and Sequin has 2,203. webrtc has the larger community by that measure.
Are webrtc and Sequin free?
Both are open source. webrtc is licensed under MIT and Sequin under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webrtc and Sequin?
webrtc is written in Go and Sequin in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webrtc or Sequin?
Choose webrtc if you want the larger community (16,785 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Sequin if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.