head to head · open source

three.js vs pokerth

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pokerth has 655 stars, 252 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. three.js leads on adoption by 17,554% (115,636 vs 655 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; pokerth is written in C++ under AGPL-3.0. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, pokerth 38%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K pokerth ★ 655 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js pokerth
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 655
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 252
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick pokerth if

  • You want the pokerth feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and pokerth fits your workflow better

full pokerth profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About pokerth

PokerTH is an open source Texas Hold'em poker game and engine written in C++ with Qt, for players who want to play against computer opponents or against other people over the internet, and for hosts who want to run the multiplayer server themselves.

read the full pokerth overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs s&box

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or pokerth more popular?

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars and pokerth has 655. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and pokerth free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and pokerth under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and pokerth?

three.js is written in JavaScript and pokerth in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or pokerth?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,636 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pokerth if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.