head to head · open source
three.js vs novu
three.js has 117,439 GitHub stars, 36,894 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. novu has 40,249 stars, 4,522 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js leads on adoption by 192% (117,439 vs 40,249 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; novu is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. three.js has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, novu 11%. novu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| three.js | novu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 117K | ★ 40K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 37K | ⑂ 4.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick three.js if
- You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick novu if
- You want the novu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and novu fits your workflow better
About three.js
three.js [![NPM Package][npm]][npm url] [![Build Size][build size]][build size url] [![NPM Downloads][npm downloads]][npmtrends url] [![jsDelivr Downloads][jsdelivr downloads]][jsdelivr url] [![Discord][discord]][discord url] JavaScript 3D library The aim of the project is to create an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose 3D library. The current builds only include WebGL and WebGPU renderers but SVG and CSS3D renderers are also available as addons. Examples — Docs — Manual — Wiki — Migrating — Questions — Forum — Discord Usage This code creates a…
read the full three.js overview →
About novu
The open source communication infrastructure for agents and products One API and one unified conversation model to connect your products and your agents to every channel your users live on — Inbox, Email, SMS, Push, Chat, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Telegram, and more. Learn More » Report a bug · Docs · Website · Join our Discord · Changelog · Roadmap · X · Contact us Software is becoming more conversational, and user expectations are rising with it. People no longer want static, irrelevant notifications they glance at and forget, they want to engage, ask questions, and go deeper. Instead of a one way report dropped…
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is three.js or novu more popular?
three.js has 117,439 GitHub stars and novu has 40,249. three.js has the larger community by that measure.
Are three.js and novu free?
Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT, and novu has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between three.js and novu?
three.js is written in JavaScript and novu in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, three.js or novu?
Choose three.js if you want the larger community (117,439 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose novu if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.