head to head · open source

three.js vs nightingale

three.js has 117,439 GitHub stars, 36,894 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nightingale has 1,527 stars, 117 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js leads on adoption by 7,591% (117,439 vs 1,527 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; nightingale is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. three.js has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, nightingale 8%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 117K nightingale ★ 1.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js nightingale
GitHub stars ★ 117K ★ 1.5K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 117
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick nightingale if

  • You want the nightingale feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nightingale fits your workflow better

full nightingale profile →

About three.js

three.js [![NPM Package][npm]][npm url] [![Build Size][build size]][build size url] [![NPM Downloads][npm downloads]][npmtrends url] [![jsDelivr Downloads][jsdelivr downloads]][jsdelivr url] [![Discord][discord]][discord url] JavaScript 3D library The aim of the project is to create an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose 3D library. The current builds only include WebGL and WebGPU renderers but SVG and CSS3D renderers are also available as addons. Examples — Docs — Manual — Wiki — Migrating — Questions — Forum — Discord Usage This code creates a…

read the full three.js overview →

About nightingale

Karaoke from any song in your music library, powered by neural networks. Nightingale scans your music folder, Plex Media Server, Jellyfin server, Navidrome server, or self hosted web library; separates lead vocals from instrumentals using the UVR Karaoke model (or Demucs); transcribes lyrics with word level timestamps via WhisperX; and plays it all back with synchronized highlighting, pitch scoring, key/tempo controls, profiles, and dynamic backgrounds. Ships as a single binary. No manual installation of Python, ffmpeg, or ML models required — everything is downloaded and bootstrapped automatically on first…

read the full nightingale overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or nightingale more popular?

three.js has 117,439 GitHub stars and nightingale has 1,527. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and nightingale free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and nightingale under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and nightingale?

three.js is written in JavaScript and nightingale in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or nightingale?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (117,439 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nightingale if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.