head to head · open source

three.js vs agones

three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars, 36,556 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agones has 7,032 stars, 943 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped today. three.js leads on adoption by 1,545% (115,666 vs 7,032 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; agones is written in Go under Apache-2.0. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, agones 13%. agones was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K agones ★ 7.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js agones
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 7.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 943
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick agones if

  • You want the agones feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and agones fits your workflow better

full agones profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About agones

Agones is an open source library for hosting, running and scaling dedicated game servers on Kubernetes, built for game developers, platform engineers and live ops teams that need multiplayer server capacity without bespoke cluster management.

read the full agones overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs Babylon.js three.js vs libgdx three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs colyseus

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or agones more popular?

three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars and agones has 7,032. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and agones free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and agones under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and agones?

three.js is written in JavaScript and agones in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or agones?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,666 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agones if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.