head to head · open source

sharp vs openscreen

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. openscreen has 3,046 stars, 191 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 973% (32,692 vs 3,046 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; openscreen is written in TypeScript under MIT. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, openscreen 6%. openscreen was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K openscreen ★ 3.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp openscreen
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 191
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick openscreen if

  • You want the openscreen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openscreen fits your workflow better

full openscreen profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About openscreen

OpenScreen is a free, MIT licensed, GPU accelerated desktop screen recorder and video editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux that turns a raw capture into a polished product demo, aimed at developers, product teams, and technical marketers who need demo video without subscriptions or watermarks.

read the full openscreen overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or openscreen more popular?

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars and openscreen has 3,046. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and openscreen free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openscreen under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and openscreen?

sharp is written in JavaScript and openscreen in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or openscreen?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openscreen if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.