head to head · open source

sharp vs nomacs

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. nomacs has 3,174 stars, 203 forks, 337 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 930% (32,692 vs 3,174 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; nomacs is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, nomacs 6%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (avif), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K nomacs ★ 3.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp nomacs
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.2K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 203
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick nomacs if

  • You want the nomacs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and nomacs fits your workflow better

full nomacs profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About nomacs

nomacs is a free, open source image viewer written in C++ and released under the GPL 3.0, built for anyone on Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Mac, Haiku, or OS/2 who needs to open and inspect common images as well as RAW and PSD files on the desktop.

read the full nomacs overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or nomacs more popular?

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars and nomacs has 3,174. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and nomacs free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and nomacs under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and nomacs?

sharp is written in JavaScript and nomacs in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or nomacs?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose nomacs if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.