head to head · open source
sharp vs foldergram
sharp has 32,728 GitHub stars, 1,440 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. foldergram has 568 stars, 34 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 5,662% (32,728 vs 568 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; foldergram is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, foldergram 6%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| sharp | foldergram | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 568 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 34 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick sharp if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foldergram if
- You want the foldergram feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and foldergram fits your workflow better
About sharp
sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.
read the full sharp overview →
About foldergram
Foldergram is a self hosted, folder based photo and video gallery that turns an existing directory of local media into an Instagram style feed and profile, and it is aimed at individuals and small teams who want to browse their own files through a fast Progressive Web App without uploading anything to a cloud service.
read the full foldergram overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is sharp or foldergram more popular?
sharp has 32,728 GitHub stars and foldergram has 568. sharp has the larger community by that measure.
Are sharp and foldergram free?
Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and foldergram under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between sharp and foldergram?
sharp is written in JavaScript and foldergram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, sharp or foldergram?
Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,728 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose foldergram if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.