head to head · open source
sharp vs foldergram
sharp has 32,845 GitHub stars, 1,452 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. foldergram has 606 stars, 36 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 5,320% (32,845 vs 606 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; foldergram is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, foldergram 6%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| sharp | foldergram | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 606 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-13 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 36 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick sharp if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foldergram if
- You want the foldergram feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and foldergram fits your workflow better
About sharp
sharp The typical use case for this high speed Node API module is to convert large images in common formats to smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF images of varying dimensions. It can be used with all JavaScript runtimes that provide support for Node API v9, including Node.js ( = 20.9.0), Deno and Bun. Resizing an image is typically 4x 5x faster than using the quickest ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick settings due to its use of libvips. Colour spaces, embedded ICC profiles and alpha transparency channels are all handled correctly. Lanczos resampling ensures quality is not sacrificed for speed. As…
read the full sharp overview →
About foldergram
Foldergram Local only photo and video gallery for folders, with an Instagram inspired browsing pattern. Live Demo • Features • Installation • Configuration • Tech Stack • Contributing Try the public demo: foldergram.intentdeep.com Foldergram is a self hosted web application that turns your local folders into a beautiful, instagram style feed and profile. It turns your local folder to app folders (profiles), and serves a lightning fast Progressive Web App (PWA). Foldergram indexes supported media from a configured GALLERY ROOT , stores metadata in SQLite, generates thumbnails and previews, and serves a fast feed…
read the full foldergram overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is sharp or foldergram more popular?
sharp has 32,845 GitHub stars and foldergram has 606. sharp has the larger community by that measure.
Are sharp and foldergram free?
Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and foldergram under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between sharp and foldergram?
sharp is written in JavaScript and foldergram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, sharp or foldergram?
Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,845 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose foldergram if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.