head to head · open source
AutoMQ vs Sequin
AutoMQ has 10,775 GitHub stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sequin has 2,203 stars, 149 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 389% (10,775 vs 2,203 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Sequin is written in Elixir under MIT. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Sequin 7%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kafka), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AutoMQ | Sequin | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-02-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 771 | ⑂ 149 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AutoMQ if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Sequin if
- You want the Sequin feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and Sequin fits your workflow better
About AutoMQ
AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.
read the full AutoMQ overview →
About Sequin
Sequin is an open source change data capture platform for Postgres. It lives in the Postgres ecosystem and reads database changes, then sends those changes to streams, queues, search indexes, and other endpoints. The project is written in Elixir and released under the MIT license.
read the full Sequin overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AutoMQ or Sequin more popular?
AutoMQ has 10,775 GitHub stars and Sequin has 2,203. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.
Are AutoMQ and Sequin free?
Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Sequin under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AutoMQ and Sequin?
AutoMQ is written in Java and Sequin in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AutoMQ or Sequin?
Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,775 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Sequin if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.