head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs reviewdog
code-review-graph has 31,619 GitHub stars, 2,878 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. reviewdog has 9,601 stars, 495 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 229% (31,619 vs 9,601 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. reviewdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-review, static-analysis), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 9.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 495 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog is an automated code review tool written in Go and released under the MIT license. It lives in the version control and collaboration space of the developer tooling ecosystem, and it integrates with code analysis tools regardless of programming language. Rather than performing analysis itself, reviewdog consumes the output of existing linters and static analysis tools and turns those findings into review comments on code hosting services. The project has been published for roughly ten years, carries more than nine thousand stars and close to five hundred forks, and its topic list covers CI, linting, stat…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or reviewdog more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,619 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,601. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and reviewdog?
code-review-graph is written in Python and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or reviewdog?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,619 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.