head to head · open source

rembg vs PixImagePicker

rembg has 24,889 GitHub stars, 2,423 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. PixImagePicker has 871 stars, 219 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. rembg leads on adoption by 2,758% (24,889 vs 871 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; PixImagePicker is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, PixImagePicker 25%. rembg was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K PixImagePicker ★ 871 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg PixImagePicker
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 871
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-04-15
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 219
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick PixImagePicker if

  • You want the PixImagePicker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and PixImagePicker fits your workflow better

full PixImagePicker profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About PixImagePicker

PixImagePicker (Pix) is an Apache 2.0 Kotlin library for Android that reproduces the WhatsApp image and video picker inside an existing app, aimed at Android developers who need a gallery, camera and video selection flow without building one from scratch.

read the full PixImagePicker overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs rembg opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or PixImagePicker more popular?

rembg has 24,889 GitHub stars and PixImagePicker has 871. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and PixImagePicker free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and PixImagePicker under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and PixImagePicker?

rembg is written in Python and PixImagePicker in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or PixImagePicker?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,889 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PixImagePicker if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.