head to head · open source

rembg vs photoview

rembg has 24,796 GitHub stars, 2,423 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. photoview has 6,528 stars, 485 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rembg leads on adoption by 280% (24,796 vs 6,528 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; photoview is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, photoview 7%. photoview was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K photoview ★ 6.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg photoview
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 6.5K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-08 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 485
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick photoview if

  • You want the photoview feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and photoview fits your workflow better

full photoview profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About photoview

Photoview is an AGPL 3.0 licensed photo and video gallery server written in Go that scans an existing folder of media on a self hosted machine and serves it as a fast, browsable website built for photographers.

read the full photoview overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs Krita rembg vs TagStudio rembg vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or photoview more popular?

rembg has 24,796 GitHub stars and photoview has 6,528. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and photoview free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and photoview under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and photoview?

rembg is written in Python and photoview in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or photoview?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,796 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose photoview if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.