head to head · open source

rembg vs pho

rembg has 24,847 GitHub stars, 2,421 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. pho has 1,165 stars, 95 forks, 55 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. rembg leads on adoption by 2,033% (24,847 vs 1,165 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; pho is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pho 8%. rembg was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K pho ★ 1.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg pho
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 1.2K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Dart
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-20
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 95
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick pho if

  • You want the pho feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and pho fits your workflow better

full pho profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About pho

Pho is a serverless photo gallery and synchronization application, written in Dart with Flutter and an embedded Go backend, that lets people browse the photos on their phone and incrementally back them up to network storage they already own, and it is aimed at Android and iOS users who want to replace the built in gallery app.

read the full pho overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs rembg opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or pho more popular?

rembg has 24,847 GitHub stars and pho has 1,165. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and pho free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and pho under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and pho?

rembg is written in Python and pho in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or pho?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,847 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pho if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.