head to head · open source

rembg vs foldergram

rembg has 24,914 GitHub stars, 2,426 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. foldergram has 568 stars, 34 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. rembg leads on adoption by 4,286% (24,914 vs 568 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; foldergram is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, foldergram 6%. rembg was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K foldergram ★ 568 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg foldergram
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 568
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick foldergram if

  • You want the foldergram feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and foldergram fits your workflow better

full foldergram profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About foldergram

Foldergram is a self hosted, folder based photo and video gallery that turns an existing directory of local media into an Instagram style feed and profile, and it is aimed at individuals and small teams who want to browse their own files through a fast Progressive Web App without uploading anything to a cloud service.

read the full foldergram overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs rembg opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or foldergram more popular?

rembg has 24,914 GitHub stars and foldergram has 568. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and foldergram free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and foldergram under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and foldergram?

rembg is written in Python and foldergram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or foldergram?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,914 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foldergram if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.