head to head · open source

rembg vs chevereto

rembg has 24,876 GitHub stars, 2,425 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. chevereto has 995 stars, 84 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. rembg leads on adoption by 2,400% (24,876 vs 995 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; chevereto is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, chevereto 8%. chevereto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K chevereto ★ 995 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg chevereto
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 995
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python PHP
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick chevereto if

  • You want the chevereto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and chevereto fits your workflow better

full chevereto profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About chevereto

Chevereto is a self hosted, AGPL 3.0 media sharing platform written in PHP that lets an individual or an organisation run its own image and video hosting site — a Flickr or Imgur of their own — with complete control over content, data and platform rules.

read the full chevereto overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs rembg opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or chevereto more popular?

rembg has 24,876 GitHub stars and chevereto has 995. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and chevereto free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and chevereto under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and chevereto?

rembg is written in Python and chevereto in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or chevereto?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,876 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chevereto if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.