head to head · open source

rembg vs Darktable

rembg has 24,796 GitHub stars, 2,423 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Darktable has 13,094 stars, 1,435 forks, 678 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rembg leads on adoption by 89% (24,796 vs 13,094 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; Darktable is written in C under GPL-3.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Darktable 11%. Darktable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K Darktable ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg Darktable
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 13K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-08 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick Darktable if

  • You want the Darktable feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Darktable fits your workflow better

full Darktable profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About Darktable

Darktable is an open source photography workflow application and non destructive raw developer. It acts as a virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers, and it lives in the open source photography ecosystem as a C project licensed under the GPL 3.0. It manages digital negatives in a database, lets a user view them through a zoomable lighttable, and supports raw development, enhancement, and export to local or remote storage.

read the full Darktable overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs darktable opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Krita rembg vs TagStudio rembg vs photoview rembg vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or Darktable more popular?

rembg has 24,796 GitHub stars and Darktable has 13,094. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and Darktable free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and Darktable under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and Darktable?

rembg is written in Python and Darktable in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or Darktable?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,796 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Darktable if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.