head to head · open source

openharness vs figma-use

openharness has 1,105 GitHub stars, 93 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped today. figma-use has 606 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. openharness leads on adoption by 82% (1,105 vs 606 stars). openharness is written in Dart under MIT; figma-use is written in TypeScript under MIT. openharness has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, figma-use 7%. openharness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openharness ★ 1.1K figma-use ★ 606 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openharness figma-use
GitHub stars ★ 1.1K ★ 606
License MIT MIT
Written in Dart TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 93 ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openharness if

  • You weight community size — 1.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openharness profile →

pick figma-use if

  • You want the figma-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and figma-use fits your workflow better

full figma-use profile →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

About figma-use

figma use is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that lets developers and AI agents read and write Figma files directly from the terminal, with more than 100 commands for creating shapes, text, components, styles, and exported images.

read the full figma-use overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

openharness vs ant-design openharness vs open-design openharness vs manim openharness vs anime openharness vs hyperframes openharness vs daisyui openharness vs tabler openharness vs motion openharness vs layui openharness vs lottie-ios openharness vs vant openharness vs primitives

Frequently asked questions

Is openharness or figma-use more popular?

openharness has 1,105 GitHub stars and figma-use has 606. openharness has the larger community by that measure.

Are openharness and figma-use free?

Both are open source. openharness is licensed under MIT and figma-use under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openharness and figma-use?

openharness is written in Dart and figma-use in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openharness or figma-use?

Choose openharness if you want the larger community (1,105 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose figma-use if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.