head to head · open source

hyperframes vs openharness

hyperframes has 51,996 GitHub stars, 4,737 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openharness has 529 stars, 50 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hyperframes leads on adoption by 9,729% (51,996 vs 529 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; openharness is written in C under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, openharness 9%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 52K openharness ★ 529 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes openharness
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 529
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 50
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick openharness if

  • You want the openharness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and openharness fits your workflow better

full openharness profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs motion hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs lottie-ios hyperframes vs vant hyperframes vs primitives hyperframes vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or openharness more popular?

hyperframes has 51,996 GitHub stars and openharness has 529. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and openharness free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openharness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and openharness?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and openharness in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or openharness?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (51,996 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openharness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.