head to head · open source

open-design vs openharness

open-design has 97,331 GitHub stars, 11,300 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openharness has 529 stars, 50 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-design leads on adoption by 18,299% (97,331 vs 529 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; openharness is written in C under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, openharness 9%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (coding-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 97K openharness ★ 529 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design openharness
GitHub stars ★ 97K ★ 529
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 50
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 97K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick openharness if

  • You want the openharness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and openharness fits your workflow better

full openharness profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design open-design vs manim open-design vs fleetbase ant-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs motion open-design vs layui open-design vs lottie-ios open-design vs vant open-design vs primitives open-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or openharness more popular?

open-design has 97,331 GitHub stars and openharness has 529. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and openharness free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openharness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and openharness?

open-design is written in TypeScript and openharness in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or openharness?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (97,331 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openharness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.