head to head · open source

primitives vs openharness

primitives has 19,309 GitHub stars, 1,247 forks, 356 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. openharness has 529 stars, 50 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped yesterday. primitives leads on adoption by 3,550% (19,309 vs 529 stars). primitives is written in TypeScript under MIT; openharness is written in C under MIT. primitives has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, openharness 9%. openharness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

primitives ★ 19K openharness ★ 529 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

primitives openharness
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 529
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-08-08 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 50
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick primitives if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full primitives profile →

pick openharness if

  • You want the openharness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and openharness fits your workflow better

full openharness profile →

About primitives

Radix Primitives is an MIT licensed, TypeScript UI component library for React, maintained by WorkOS, that gives teams building design systems and web apps low level components focused on accessibility, customization and developer experience.

read the full primitives overview →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

primitives vs ant-design primitives vs open-design primitives vs manim primitives vs anime primitives vs hyperframes primitives vs daisyui primitives vs tabler primitives vs motion primitives vs layui primitives vs lottie-ios primitives vs vant primitives vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is primitives or openharness more popular?

primitives has 19,309 GitHub stars and openharness has 529. primitives has the larger community by that measure.

Are primitives and openharness free?

Both are open source. primitives is licensed under MIT and openharness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between primitives and openharness?

primitives is written in TypeScript and openharness in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, primitives or openharness?

Choose primitives if you want the larger community (19,309 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openharness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.